The overall organization and differentiation
of modern prostitution finds its roots in classical
antiquity, with the exception that the close inter-relation
between prostitution and sexually transmitted disease
was then unknown. Thus, any attempts at regulating various
aspects of prostitution and the resolution of conflicts
connected to it were carried out in an atmosphere in
which prostitution was widely tolerated by the rulers.
Later, attempts at legislation were
prompted by the spread of infectious disease. In the
majority of cases, countries sought to solve the problem
of venereal disease by establishing control over prostitution.
There were, however, so many "unprofessional"
prostitutes as to render all attempts at legislation
and control ineffective, even in Western Europe, where
prostitutes were forced to register as early as the
19th century. In Britain and America, such controls
were absent. In 1864, 1866, and 1869, in conjunction
with laws mandating regular medical check-ups for women,
British police began to register prostitutes, which
lead to widespread protest. British women of high society
came to the defense of prostitutes' constitutional rights,
saying that men had no moral right to pass such laws
against women. As a result, the laws were first nullified,
and later stricken from the books completely. In 1885
amendments to the penal code made it illegal to operate
brothels and outlawed pimping, though prostitution remained
legal. Efforts at regulation in America were similarly
unsuccessful.
In light of such mixed results in the
civilian sphere, army and navy high commands everywhere
took their own measures to preserve the fighting capacities
of their forces (threatened by a catastrophically high
rate of infection).
"In Germany during WW1 a sergeant
from the medical corps stood at the entrance to the
military bordello to check the soldiers' medical documents,
record their name and rank, pass out creams and medicines,
and collect money. During peak hours, each visitor was
allowed only ten minutes, after which the sergeant on
duty would yell "Next!"
Declaring prostitution to be unavoidable
means admitting it as a constituent part of sexual morality.
This is a one-sided, patriarchal point of view, the
ramifications of which are well known.
The process for regulating prostitution
always follows a distinct pattern. First the trade is
localized within a specific area - a building, street,
or district. Following this, we see the regulation of
all aspects of the process - from fixed rates (price
lists) to medical services and education for the women
involved. Further measures lead to the organization
of unions for prostitutes, through which they may assert
and defend their rights. These unions also conduct a
battle against secret and illegal prostitution, which
is usually no less prevalent than its legally approved
counterpart. In some cases this battle has taken the
form of violent conflict - fights, window-smashing,
and arson.
The social and ethical dangers inherent
to the regulation and legalization of prostitution have
been debated since ancient times. Government regulation
not only fails to protect honest women from the advances
of men, but also gradually degrades and demoralizes
women in general. Open (de-criminalized) prostitution
in no way infringes on the existence of its under-ground
counterpart, but only contributes to the spread of prostitution
to all the levels of a society. Social movements opposed
to government regulation and legalization of prostitution
have stressed all these factors: the ineffectiveness
of most such programs, as well as the harmful impact
of prostitution on women, and on the overall social
life. During the Middle Ages government regulation and
control over brothels evolved into a system regulated
to the smallest details, a sort of accounting house
which kept records on every brothel and every prostitute,
recording such information as age, income, home, health
status, and so on. The result of this system was to
make it impossible for most prostitutes to ever return
to the rank-and-file of society.
Individual opinions on prostitution
vary widely, and are conditioned by the social environment.
Tolerant attitudes towards prostitution are always accompanied
by harsh protests against it. Prostitution is depicted
as the root of all evils, and the "deepest pit
of hell a man and woman can fall into". All these
arguments, however, both for and against prostitution,
are borne of a narrow-minded world view.
Conclusion
The most recent data have shown that
the type of sexual culture, and the level of social
instability have a major influence on the extent of
prostitution in a society. This is supported by the
following observation: "The Victorian age transformed
middle class women into sickly-sweet, touchy, moralizing
people, whose aversion to sex contributed to a meteoric
rise in prostitution, an epidemic of venereal disease,
and the emergence of masochism as a fashion." The
social restraint of prostitution, then, is a cultural
formation which supports sexuality, and developed systems
of sexological education.
National
Research Center on Addictions
Rehabilitation Dept.,
Moscow, Russia
Page 4
Using this
free information, please, don't forget to make or to print
the link to www.apsexology.com